Rent Abatement Checklist

Are there bad conditions in your client's apartment? Not sure if she has a better claim for the diminished value of the unit than three months rent?  Check out some abatements that have been awarded around the state for certain conditions.

  1. Bed Bugs

  2. 1. Bed Bugs

    Lund v. Tessier, Housing Court Docket No. 12-CV-00852 (Chaplin, J., 2013) (awarding 50% rent abatement for bedbug infestation.); Maher v. GaCosta, Housing Court Docket No. 07-SP-01205 (Chaplin , J., 2007) (awarding 50% rent abatement for bedbug infestation and 10% abatement for other conditions); Shepton Realty Trust v. Smith, Housing Court Docket No. 06-SP-404089 (Chaplin,  J., 2006) (awarding 40% rent abatement for bedbug infestation).

  3. Broken Thermostat

  4. 2. Broken Thermostat

    Gao v. Alpha Mgt. & Faisal, Docket No. 15-SC-0091 (Muirhead, J., 5/18/16)( 15% abatement for improper thermostat)

  5. Doors

  6. 3. Doors

    Cuatodio v. Snyder, Western Housing Court Docket No.: No. 14-CV-200 (Fields, March 24, 2016) (2% for missing closet door.); Daemco, LLC, v. Barnes, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 15-SP-02846 (Dalton, J., December 31, 2015) (1% for defective condition of the front door, including the need for a storm door and a screen door.)

  7. Fan

  8. 4. Fan

    Cuatodio v. Snyder, Western Housing Court Docket No.: No. 14-CV-200 (Fields, March 24, 2016) (5% abatement for the bathroom fan.)

  9. Faulty Electrical Outlets

  10. 5. Faulty Electrical Outlets

    Cranberry Highway Estates v. Zavalcofsky, Housing Court Docket No. 06-SP-6058 (2007) (Awarding tenant 5% for faulty electrical outlets).

  11. Homelessness

  12. 6. Homelessness

    Gladu v. Farrick, Docket No. 02-CV-0111 (Abrashkin, J., 2002) (Awarded $200 a day for homelessness); Rosario v. Rivera, 06-SP-1090 (Fein, J., 2006) (Awarded $15,000 for 87 days of homelessness in a lockout).

  13. Insufficient water

  14. 7. Insufficient water

    Cranberry Highway Estates v. Zavalcofsky, Housing Court  Docket No. 06-SP-6058 (2007) (10% for insufficient hot water); Haddad v Pena, Housing Court No. 97-SP-01114 (Winik, J.,11/26/1997)( 50% Abatement for no heat/hot water); Cuatodio v. Snyder, Western Housing Court Docket No.: No. 14-CV-200 (Fields, March 24, 2016) (80% for the lack of water (caused by sewage backup.)

  15. Lack of Sufficient Heat

  16. 8. Lack of Sufficient Heat

    Gao v. Alpha Mgt. & Faisal, Docket No. 15-SC-0091 (Muirhead, J., 5/18/16)  (25% abatement for insufficient heat); Daemco, LLC, v. Barnes, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 15-SP-02846 (Dalton, J., December 31, 2015) (5% for non-functional propane stove/heater in the sunroom for the part of the heating season.)

  17. Lead Paint

  18. 9. Lead Paint

    Sycamore Land Corp. v. Thompson, Southeast Housing Court Docket No. 11-SP-02353 (Chaplin, J., 1/25/1994)(15 % Abatement for lead paint).

  19. Leaking & Water Damage

  20. 10. Leaking & Water Damage

    Cranberry Highway Estates v. Zavalcofsky, Housing Court Docket No. 06-SP-6058 (2007) (Awarding tenant 10% for leaking sink); Rijo v. Idusuyl, Western Housing Court  No. 16-SP-4714 (Fields, J., December 22, 2016) (10% abatement for leaking shower); Samia v. Floyd, Housing Court Docket No. 96-SP-03964 (Winik, J., 1997)(5% Abatement for Cosmetic water damage. Also awarded $425 for breach of implied warranty of habitability); Shays v. Garcia, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 16-SP-2445 (Theophilis, J., July, 2016) (50% abatement for ongoing leaks, the collapsed ceilings in the kitchen and bathroom and the inoperable toilet).

  21. Leaking Ceiling

  22. 11. Leaking Ceiling

    Lund v. Tessier, Housing Court Docket No. 12-CV-00852 (Chaplin,  J., 2013) (awarding 15% for leaking ceiling); Cranberry Highway Estates v. Zavalcofsky, Housing Court Docket No. 06-SP-6058 (2007) (Awarding tenant 30% rent abatement for leaking ceiling); Bronhard v. Talbot, Housing Court Docket No. 07-SP-00642 (2008) (Awarding tenant 40% rent abatement for leaking ceiling);  Quinn v. Borges, Housing Court Docket No. 06-SP-5029 (2006) (Granting tenant a 20% rent abatement for leaking ceiling and 50% rent abatement for property clutter and presence of asbestos in basement); Structures, Inc. vs. Rashti, Boston Housing Court, No. 98-05475(Winik, J.,November 10, 1998) (50% abatement for significant water leakage.)

  23. Mold

  24. 12. Mold

    Bronhard v. Talbot, Housing Court Docket No. 07-SP-00642 (2008) (Awarding tenant 20% for presence of mold).

  25. No Smoke or Carbon Monoxide detector

  26. 13. No Smoke or Carbon Monoxide detector

    Gao v. Alpha Mgt. & Faisal,  Docket No. 15-SC-0091 (Muirhead, J., 5/18/16)  (10% abatement for lack of detectors); Krasowski v. Alexis, Docket NO. 97-05984 (Winik, J., 2/12/1998) (Defect reduced fair market value by $10 a month ($650 - $640) for no smoke detector).

  27. Rodents

  28. 14. Rodents

    Kim v. Wilson, Housing Court 09-SP-1304 (Muirhead, J., 10/20/09 and 10/26/09) (tenant entitled to 20% abatement for claims of rodents and electrical problems; damages of three months rent for interference with quiet enjoyment exceeded abatement and awarded); Powers v Gill, Housing Court Docket No. 16-SP-2238 (Muirhead, J., 7/20/16) (25% abatement for rodents.); Fall River HA v. Gutkowski, Housing Court Docket No.14-SP04443 (Edwards, J., 5/13/2016) (60% abatement for rodents, green mold and floating tub. Abatement not broken down.); Haddad v. Pena, No. 97-SP-01114 (Winik, J.,11/26/1997)( 5% Abatement rodents); Shays v. Garcia, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 16-SP-2445 (Theophilis, J., July, 2016) (additional 10% abatement for severe rodent infestation at the premises.)

  29. Stairs & Porch

  30. 15. Stairs & Porch

    Sarno v Ingalls, (8/21/2009) ( 15% abatement for a defective porch.); Cuatodio v. Snyder, Western Housing Court Docket No.: No. 14-CV-200 (Fields, March 24, 2016) (2% for the loose handrail); Daemco, LLC, v. Barnes, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 15-SP-02846 (Dalton, J., December 31, 2015) (5% for unsafe side Entry Stairs.)

  31. Stove & Dishwasher

  32. 16. Stove & Dishwasher

    Lund v. Tessier, Housing Court Docket No. 12-CV-00852 (Chaplin, J., 2013) (awarding 10% for broken stove); Rozantes v. Brown, et al., Housing Court Docket No.16-SP-507 (Muirhead, J., 3/10/16) ($1,000 abatement, for inoperable stove no percentage given.); Cuatodio v. Snyder, Western Housing Court Docket No.: No. 14-CV-200 (Fields, March 24, 2016) (5% for the non-functioning dishwasher.); Daemco, LLC, v. Barnes, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 15-SP-02846 (Dalton, J., December 31, 2015) (5% for Defective Stove/Oven).

  33. Toilet

  34. 17. Toilet

    Shays v. Garcia, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 16-SP-2445 (Theophilis, J., July, 2016) (50% abatement for ongoing leaks, the collapsed ceilings in the kitchen and bathroom and the inoperable toilet); Cuatodio v. Snyder, Western Housing Court Docket No.: No. 14-CV-200 (Fields, March 24, 2016) (5% for the loose toilet.)

  35. Uninhabitable

  36. 18. Uninhabitable

    Where an apartment is uninhabitable and/or contains substantial defects, the percentage abatement may be 100%.  McKenna v. Begin, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 304, 362 N.E.2d 548, 554 (1977) (concurrence); McKenna v. Begin, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 168, 325 N.E.2d 587, 591 (1975); Boston Housing Authority v. Hemingway, 363 Mass. 184, 293 N.E.2d 831, 844 (1973); Allard v. Campbell, Northeast Housing Court Docket No. 92-SP-346 (Kerman, J., 10/6/91) (100% abatement for two months where severe infestation of cockroaches and rodents, filthy toilet, thick fungal growth near shoer, electrical wiring improper and inadequate and dangerous fire escape); Museum Square Apts. v. Martinez, Housing Court No. 94-SP-1893, Northeast (Kerman, J., 3/20/96) (100 percent abatement for 5 months where significant flooding of apartment); Greco v. Dieulie, Somerville District Court No. 9510-CV-529 (Coven, J., 1995) (100 percent abatement for 5 months due to serious cockroach infestation and lack of heat). See also FNMA v. Snow, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 13-SP-161 (Sullivan, J., 4/25/13) (100% abatement, no description as to why); Haddad v. Pena, No. 97-SP-01114 (Winik, J.,11/26/1997)( 100% Abatement for no water).

  37. Windows, Screens and Blinds

  38. 19. Windows, Screens and Blinds

    Bronhard v. Talbot, Southeastern Housing Court Docket No. 07-SP-00642 (2008) (Awarding tenant 15% for non-weather-tight windows); Haddad v Pena, Housing Court No. 97-SP-01114 (Winik, J.,11/26/1997)(5% and 15% Abatement for drafty windows); Kennaway v. DePerrio, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 16-SP-2112 (Theophelis, J., July, 2016) (10% abatement for malfunctioning windows and lack of screens); Cuatodio v. Snyder, Western Housing Court Docket No.: No. 14-CV-200 (Fields, March 24, 2016) (2% for the nonfunctioning Venetian blind.); Daemco, LLC, v. Barnes, Worcester Housing Court Docket No. 15-SP-02846 (Dalton, J., December 31, 2015) (1% for three windows which did not have locks.)